Opinion 
 Blogs 
 National Comment 
 Housing's downhill run has upside 

Housing's downhill run has upside

I've always been taken by the catch-cry of the great American con man, Bernie Cornfeld: "Do you sincerely want to be rich?" Most of us would like to be rich, but only a very few of us - and certainly not me - sincerely want to be rich.

To be fair dinkum about getting rich you have to be prepared to make the sacrifices involved: to find an occupation that's lucrative rather than satisfying, to give up your leisure, and neglect family and friends as you work day and night to amass and reinvest your fortune. Above all, you need to want to be rich for the sake of being rich, not for the sake of being a big spender.

No, most of us don't want to be rich that badly. But let me ask you a question: were you pleased to hear the latest news that house prices are falling nationwide?

If you weren't, I suspect you don't sincerely care about the deterioration in housing affordability - as most of us imagine we do care.

Most of us care about the plight of first home buyers only to the extent of believing that the Government should do something about it. Were it to do something that adversely affected the interests of us existing home owners, however, it would quickly feel our wrath.

And since there isn't much governments could do to genuinely assist first home buyers that wouldn't disadvantage us, the pollies share our lack of sincerity on the subject.

But the politicians do have the advantage of the econocrats quietly advising them of something the rest of us keep forgetting: housing affordability moves in cycles.

I should know - I've been writing about the "crisis in affordability" on and off throughout my 30-plus years as an economic commentator. (One of the most important qualifications for being a commentator is just knowing that most things in the economy move in cycles.)

The affordability of home ownership is a product of three factors: the price of homes, the level of incomes and the level of interest rates. Whenever the property market booms, house prices rise a lot faster than incomes and so affordability worsens.

Property booms generally start at a time when interest rates are low. They reach a peak at a time when the rest of the economy is booming and the authorities start worrying about mounting inflation pressure.

That's when the central bank acts to cool things down by raising interest rates. Initially, that makes affordability even worse. This is the point where people, having been sitting back gleefully watching the value of their home soar, start worrying about how their kids will ever afford a home of their own.

Eventually, however, the authorities achieve - or, more usually, over-achieve - the desired slowing in the economy. They then start cutting interest rates, which improves affordability.

But by then the property boom has turned to bust, the banks are more reluctant to lend and many people, being uncertain about hanging on to their jobs, are reluctant to take on the onerous commitment of a mortgage.

In the good old days, house prices would stay pretty steady for a few years, allowing people's incomes to catch up and thereby further improving affordability.

It was this pattern that entrenched the popular conviction that house prices never fall - although they always used to fall in real terms as inflation rolled on.

But that pattern ended with the severe recession of the early 1990s, which saw house prices actually falling, not just marking time.

And now, according to the more reliable figures produced by Australian Property Monitors, we see house prices falling in the three months to June in all capital cities bar Adelaide.

In Sydney they fell by 2.1 per cent; in Melbourne, by 0.6 per cent. In the mining boom towns of Brisbane and Perth, they fell by 1.3 per cent and 2.8 per cent.

In the two cities where prices rose highest, the softening has been greatest. Over the year to June, prices rose by just 1.1 per cent in Sydney and fell by 1.6 per cent in Perth.

The bigger they are, the harder they fall. And since the past decade has seen by far the biggest property boom in memory, I won't be surprised to see prices fall back a fair way. Australian Property Monitors' prediction is that national house and unit prices will fall by 10per cent over the coming year.

This, of course, would do wonders for housing affordability - more than the falls in interest rates we can expect in coming months - even if few first home buyers are likely to take advantage of it until the economy turns back up.

Still don't like the thought of falling house prices as the solution to affordability? Prices rose to such unprecedented levels relative to average incomes that only a significant fall in them could get affordability back on track.

Falling house prices are, however, a two-edged sword. As homeowners perceive their wealth to be diminishing, this can encourage them to cut back their spending, contributing to the downturn.

And were the fall in prices to be too precipitous it could give a lot of home owners - particularly those with big mortgages - a bad scare.

I think people with negatively geared investment properties are particularly vulnerable. They've structured their investment to run at a cash loss in the hope that big capital gains will make it all worthwhile in the end.

But when prices start falling, why hang on?

Why not cut your losses and sell before prices fall further?

Trouble is, the more investors who head for the exit, the more prices fall.

It's possible that owner-occupiers who bought at the peak of the boom may find themselves facing "negative equity" - owing more than their house is now worth. This is unlikely to induce them to sell up and crystallise their loss, however. Only if they lose their jobs and can't keep up their repayments are they likely to be forced out.

I have a feeling that the next few years are not going to be terribly pleasant.

Long before they're over, however, people will have stopped worrying about housing affordability.

Print
Increase Text Size
Decrease Text Size
Page:
1

Comments


Date: Newest first | Oldest first
Ross, congratulations on an impartial and well thought-out piece of commentary. One should also pay particular attention to overseas dire assessment of Australia's housing crash and imminent recession which are generally objective and non-biased unlike the endless stream of propaganda dished out by the local commentariat. Chesk this for instance: http://www.telegraph.co.uk/money/main.jhtml?xml=/money/2008/ 07/30/cnoz130.xml
Posted by Jose Murphy on 7/08/2008 7:45:22 AM
Governments talk about concerns for affordability when they do everything to exacerbate the housing inflation situation, namely: - unduly low interest rates leading to excessive mortgage levels, easy credit and undue price pressure; - massive increases in national money supply - over 12 % pa; - ridiculous levels of immigration - over 160000 pa on top of natural growth - causing undue demand pressure on existing stock; (This is the greatest single cause that no Govt will admit to); - supply restrictions caused by planning laws, lack of infrastructure and limited land release; - free money, like first home buyer grants, which purely acts to push prices higher on limited stock supplies. (Using our tax money to put more pressure on price levels). Remember all this next time you hear the PM and others waffling around on this subject.
Posted by James on 8/08/2008 8:59:24 AM
If one is an owner occupier with one house only a rise in the value has no impact on your real wealth, as if you sell your house you need to buy another one, which is correspondingly expensive. It is the same house whether it is worth $200,000. $500,000 or a million. The only beneficiaries are people who are buying a cheaper house to replace their current abode, in which case the cash difference would be greater if prices are higher, or children inheriting a house from their parents, as they get more money for the house when they sell it. However, if they have not yet bought a home their housing costs will also be higher. Householders can be disadvantaged by higher prices as they have to pay higher council and sewerage rates. For many Adelaide householders the property based sewerage charge far outweighs anything they pay for using water. On the other hand, people who cannot pay their mortgages and need to sell can suffer from reduced equity in their homes if prices fall steeply.
Posted by fleurrouge on 9/08/2008 10:16:39 PM
For people out of the house owners club, but getting back in, the question is how long to hold off buying? While any bank returns 8% on your house money it is very tempting to hold off as long as possible.
Posted by Tom on 10/08/2008 7:59:15 AM
and remember, if you are tempted to cut & run, "jingle mail" does not exist in oz. The banks can sue for remainder debt if they are not covered by the house sale!!
Posted by Tragicofperth on 10/08/2008 12:36:23 PM
John Howard inflated the property bubble with first-homebuyers grants and then kept it inflated for the term of his office with the highest immigration levels in Australia's history. Howard's foul legacy won't be just the housing crash, it will be the accompanying lack of water and civic infrastructure to cope with the equivalent of forty new cities the size of Ballarat. Howard left us worse off than we've ever been.
Posted by Walter on 12/08/2008 10:55:09 AM
Ross Gittins is right on the ball, as usual; but p'raps we can go further. Housing is now another of the Aust'n industries that no longer relate primarily to their announced function/focus but instead serve as cats's paws for the finance sector. This flows from the 1980s neoliberal fallacy that housing is not a proper sphere of government policy or intervention. 'Free' markets + political votebuying is the cradle of 'housing policy' in Aust today. Have they caught the Treasury ideologues who killed our buffer of public housing yet?
Posted by Brian on 14/08/2008 5:07:37 PM
Panic selling on the part of "baby boomers" who are downsizing their accommodation and ridding themselves of their woefully performing "investment" properties will make this recession both wide and deep. Time is on the side of young first home buyers. It is not on the side of the "boomers".
Posted by Tone on 15/08/2008 4:21:38 AM
National Comment
Here is the place for you to vent on any national or world news and lifestyle stories on the YourGuide websites. If there is anything you see or hear that you like or don't like, tell us. Don't keep it to yourself!
Ross Gittins
Ross Gittins

20/11/2008 | There is something worse than having one GFC. That's having two.
WA Country Builders
 
Domain.com.au
 SEND...
 SAVE...
 SHARE...